Skip to content
Key findings
  • Only 37% of Ivoirians say they trust the courts “somewhat” or “a lot” – well below the West Africa1 average of 48% and the 36-country average of 53% (Figure 1). Both the courts and the police (42%) are less trusted than most other public institutions in Côte d'Ivoire, where religious leaders (70%) enjoy the greatest public confidence (Figure 2).
  • One-third (35%) of Ivoirians say that “most” or “all” judges and magistrates are corrupt. This matches the average across 36 countries (33%) and is slightly lower than the West Africa average (40%) (Figure 3).
  • Only 6% of Ivoirians say they had dealings with the court system during the five years preceding the survey (2009-2014), the second-lowest contact rate among 36 surveyed countries (Figure 4).
  • Citizens without a formal education are less likely to have contact with the courts than those with at least a primary education. Other differences by demographic group are small (Figure 5).
  • Respondents who had interacted with the courts during the previous five years were asked which problems they encountered. Contact rates in Côte d'Ivoire were too low to report the country-specific responses,2 but they generally follow the same patterns observed in West Africa and across all 36 countries: Long delays are the most commonly cited problem, and the complexity of the legal system, lack of advice, inattentive judges, and high costs are all common experiences as well (Figure 7).

Political and military conflict has marked the development of Côte d’Ivoire’s institutions, including its judiciary. During civil war in the early 2000s, the formal justice system was entirely absent from the rebel-controlled Central-North-West regions for seven years, until early 2009 (Human Rights Watch, 2012). Meanwhile, the legal system in the government-controlled South was fraught with corruption and a lack of independence that served to further entrench a culture of impunity, along with widespread xenophobia against citizens of foreign descent, according to Human Rights Watch (2012, 2016a).

After disputed 2010 presidential elections, fighting between supporters of then-President Laurent Gbagbo and challenger Alassane Ouattara included severe human-rights violations perpetrated by both sides. Since Ouattara assumed power in 2011, only the losing side has faced criminal charges, raising questions about the fairness and independence of the Ivoirian justice system. Critics also fault Ouattara for failing to seriously confront judicial corruption (Human Rights Watch, 2016b).

Given their remarkable experiences with judicial and governmental systems, how do Ivoirians perceive their access to justice? Core elements that define citizens’ access to justice include:

1) a supportive legal framework,

2) citizen awareness of their legal rights and responsibilities,

3) availability of legal advice and representation,

4) availability of affordable and accessible justice institutions,

5) the practice of fair procedures in those institutions, and

6) enforceability of decisions (American Bar Association, 2012).

Afrobarometer Round 6 surveys included a special module that explored individuals’ perceptions of the legal system, their access to it, and their experiences when engaging with it. (For findings across all surveyed countries, please see Afrobarometer Policy Paper No. 39)

Survey responses in Côte d’Ivoire depict a judicial system with major access challenges. Many Ivoirians distrust the formal court system and prefer to take legal matters to traditional leaders and local authorities. Only about one in 20 Ivoirians had any dealings with the courts in the past five years – one of the lowest contact rates among the 36 African countries surveyed in 2014/2015. Long delays, the system’s complexities, and perceptions of bias are common complaints. Clearly, building a judicial system that citizens trust and use remains a challenge for post-conflict Côte d’Ivoire.

Pauline M. Wambua
Carolyn Logan

Carolyn is the director of analysis at Afrobarometer